Page History

...

Comments on November 22 Version:

Section 6 > Overview of Semantic Infrastructure 2.0 Architecture
"The column "Component Name" contains values of different type (things associated with "Box Name" and things without that).
The difference between the "Artifact Access" and "Artifact Registry and Retrieve" boxes is not clear from their description.
The registry service integrates with the reasoning system but the Semantic Reasoning Platform sits on top of the architecture. Assuming top-to-bottom reads as "uses/needs/ accesses" this does not fit. I would expect the Semantic Reasoning Platform on top of the Semantic Knowledge Store, and the validation component on top of the reasoning platform.
The service discovery box should mention that it is used by the Orchestration box (if orchestration is intended as composition). Otherwise a box indicating service composition is needed."
Resolution:
The chart provides a draft description of the diagram to improve accessibility. The diagram is not meant to be read with any significance of Top to bottom. Therefore the issues may not apply. Eric Schripsema

Section 6 > Overview of Semantic Infrastructure 2.0 Capabilities and Services
"Reasoning and Inference": it is not clear how inference is different from reasoning, except that it might be more specific. I think this should just be "Reasoning" or in correspondence with earlier "Decision Support". Later it turns even in "Knowledge Engineering, Inference, and Reasoning".
Resolution:

...