 |
Page History
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
{scrollbar:icons=false}
h1. { |
| Page info |
|---|
...
|
Pre Interview:
Item | Information/Response |
|---|---|
Date: | 12/17/2009 |
...
Requirement # unique id <SemCon Ops Initiative>.<analysts |
...
initials><requirement |
...
number> |
...
|
...
Init1dbw1 |
...
| Init1pm9 |
Originator/Customer's |
...
Name |
...
: |
...
...
...
: |
...
...
Originator/Customer's |
...
Company |
...
: |
...
Duke |
...
Cancer Center | |
Stakeholder Community:
|
|
Summary of requirement pre-interview, by Reviewer: | The forum posting summarizes a number of use cases that pertain to Metadata Modelers and Cancer Researchers discussed during a caBGI face-to-face meeting at Cambridge. They can be summarized as follows:
|
Recommended Next Step Enter one: Follow-up interview, Observe, Use Case Template (text), Use Case Model (formalized/UML diagram), Group Discussion, Prototype, Waiting Room | Follow-up interview |
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
Center \\ |
| *Stakeholder Community*: \\
Enter appropriate category of stakeholder from Primary Stakeholders:
* Software and Application designers and architects
* Software and Application engineers and developers
* Scientific and medical researchers
* Medical research protocol designers
* Clinical and scientific research data and metadata managers
* Clinicians
* Patients
* Medical research study participants
* Broader Stakeholders: caBIG® Community WS NIH projects and related commercial COTS vendors (caEHR, SDO's (HL7, CDISC); International Collaborators (e.g NCRI, cancerGrid, China), Government and regulatory bodies (FDA, CDC, ONC) \\
_[_(link to view SemConOps Stakeholders description_|Semantic Infrastructure Concept of Operations Stakeholders])._ | * Software and Application designers and architects
* Medical research protocol designers
* Clinical and scientific research data and metadata managers \\ |
| *Summary of requirement pre-interview, by Reviewer:* | The forum posting summarizes a number of use cases that pertain to Metadata Modelers and Cancer Researchers discussed during a caBGI face-to-face meeting at Cambridge. They can be summarized as follows:
* Automation
** Streamline the process of model creation, submission, and curation, including the tracking of artifacts (this is similar to [Init1pm8 - Simplify and streamline recording data semantics], [Init1pm6 - Automate Loading process], and [Init1pm7 - Automate & Streamline caDSR Model Submission Process])
* Enhanced Semantics
** Model/mechanism to drive through the questions on a form or during a task without manually curating CDE (need more clarity)
** Change choices on subsequent question answers based on answer to another question. More complex form of skip pattern or conditional behavior - event driven vs. skip pattern - NHS.
* Enhanced Tooling Features
** Import electronic doc/forms to caDSR.
** Improve searching for "best" CDE version (artificial intelligence - not trivial). |
| *Recommended Next Step* Enter one: Follow-up interview, Observe, Use Case Template (text), Use Case Model (formalized/UML diagram), Group Discussion, Prototype, Waiting Room | Follow-up interview \\ |
\\
{scrollbar:icons=false} |
