![]() |
Page History
...
Name | Role | Present |
---|---|---|
Wright, Larry | NIH/NCI | x |
Fragoso, Gilberto | NIH/NCI | x |
De Coronado, Sherri | NIH/NCI | x |
Safran, Tracy | NIH/NCI [C] | x |
Ong, Kim L | IS | x |
Lucas, Jason R | IS | x |
Bauer, Scott | Mayo | x |
Stancl, Craig | Mayo | x |
Endle, Cory | Mayo | x |
Sharma, Deepak | Mayo | x |
Wynne, Robert | NIH/NCI [C] | x |
Tran, Tin | NIH/NCI [C] | x |
Carlsen, Brian | NIH/NCI [C] | x |
Wong, Joanne | NIH/NCI [C] | |
Kuntipuram, Kumar | NIH/NCI [C] |
...
Assigned | Description | Date Identified | Due Date | Date Completed | Status | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rob | Close issue
| 2016.02.09 | 2016.02.10 | open | |||||||||||
Brian | For the RRF issue, come up with some examples to send out to the group to explore. | 2016.03.02 | 2016.03.09 | open | |||||||||||
Scott | For the RRF issue, send out his list of ten offenders that show this issue. | 2016.03.02 | 2016.03.09 | open |
Progress
Scott |
|
Cory |
|
Craig |
|
Agenda
Sprint Status | Current Sprint - Sprint 24 ( February 18, 2016 – April 02, 2016 ) LexEVS 6.4 S13-500 Agile Development - Sprint Status Craig mentioned that we will be exiting LexEVS phase 4. This marks the end of the lucene development. Phase 5 will start next sprint which will be verifying that CTS2, remote API, lbGUI, terms browser and other surrounding apps work with the updated LexEVS core codebase. | ||||||||||||
OBI Load Issues (Data Dev)
| We have several loader issues in the backlog that we will start to work on soon. We requested that Gilberto could look at the list of issues and prioritize. Scott suggested that we create test cases to capture the existing issues. | ||||||||||||
Nexxus Testing
| Toky delayed the testing. There is currently no scheduled date for this. | ||||||||||||
VPN and GFE
| No updates. | ||||||||||||
RRF Loads
| Scott gave a quick review of the SMQs we loaded in the database. We will review this when Brian Carlsen is available. Scott will discuss this with Brian this week. We should determine if the term browser needs to be updated for the 2.8 release. | ||||||||||||
LexEVS External Users | No updates. | ||||||||||||
We have finished up phase 4 - lucene development (100% junits passing) Upcoming Sprint: Sprint 25 (March 03, 2016 – March 16, 2016) LexEVS S13-500 Agile Development - Sprint Status#SprintStatus-Sprint25 Focus on performance. Verify Remote API, CTS2, Browser, GUI. Loader related issues:
After reviewing the existing OWL2 issues, Scott suggested that NCI reload the OWL2 files using the preference file and then re-test. | |||||||||||||
Lucene 6.4 performance
| Scott gave an overview of 6.4 Lucene performance and how it compares to 6.3. After implementing the Lucene hit collector and providing a cache, the performance appears acceptable. There is still some tuning that needs to done to increase the performance. Comparing performance from 6.4 to 6.3, some areas are better and some are a bit slower. Larry was suggesting that we used the hit collector (that retrieved all of the results up front) to ensure we got the best results. Larry was wondering if we still need to retrieve all of the results up front. Scott mentioned that collecting all of the results up front takes a large amount of time. Larry suggested that we investigate the possibility of only returning an initial amount of results (for example 1000). Scott reviewed the results spreadsheet. Scott noted that the tree extension calls take longer. Larry mentioned that that NCI would like to test it out and see how it performs. | ||||||||||||
OBI/OWL2 Load Issues
| This was discussed during the prior meeting. NCI acknowledged that they need to reload OWL2 with the preference file. Gilberto will recheck his list of issues against this new load. | ||||||||||||
OBO Hierarchy Load Issues | CTRP Update
| Tracy has worked with the new CTRP developer. We are not planning any CTS2 changes for 6.4. Tracy asked if there is a CTS2 API to get the "PROD" version of the coding scheme.
| No updates this weeks. | ||||||||||
VPN and GFE1516
| Girlberto stated the request when up the ladder for approval. Our RSA software token is tied to the user, not the machine. | ||||||||||||
RRF Loads
| Scott was wondering or the SMQs, can these be summarized in LexEVS? Brian suggested that what the loader is doing is fine. He also suggested that in the browser, qualifiers - don't show on the browser. Brian will come up with some examples to send out to the group to explore. Scott will also send out his list of ten offenders that show this issue. | ||||||||||||
LexEVS External Users | |||||||||||||
lexgrid.org xsd references | DATA_QA - value sets can be resolved. When updating PROD, some value sets cannot be resolved. The max result size is set to 500000. Scott requested to see the logs when this issue is failing. They would be term browser logs. When the browser is pointed to remote, it resolves, when it is pointed to local, only one value is returned. Scott suggested talking to Jacob about the security on PROD. Scott will follow up with Jacob off line. |
JIRA Issues
Recent LexEVS Related Bugs and Features (within last week)
...