Page History
Scrollbar | ||
---|---|---|
|
...
Page info | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pre Interview:
...
Item | Script / Question | Information/Response |
---|---|---|
1 | Hello, my name is NAME. I am calling you today because NCI and caBIG are working toward a new and improved version of the semantic infrastructure to better support integration scenarios. | yes |
2 | Do you have any solution integration needs? If so, what are they? Have you envisioned new ways of interacting with existing or new parts of the semantic infrastructure? | There is a need for a tool that would internalize various ontolologies and use them as a reference while creating new ontologies such that new ontologies can fully/partially use the relationship between various concepts. |
3 | Are there any business changes you are assuming we will be able to deal with? | Existing tools that are based on the previously existing ontologies can continue to be viable even if there are new ontologies available. |
4 | Are there any capabilities you are expecting to be available to support your needs? | Not sure |
5 | Do you use any of the existing software/services? If so, what do you like or dislike about it? | Protege plug-in NCBO bio-portal |
6 | If this requirement in met, what would be the benefits? If you do not have it, what would be the negative impact? | Existing software tools can continue to leverage the new ontologies thus these tools would have a longer shelf life |
7 | If, for any reason, we were not able to create that solution, do you think there might be another way to solve this issue? Can you think of an alternative solution? | Not sure |
8 | Would you agree that we can summarize your requirement like this? | There is a need for a tool that can internalize the existing ontologies and use thus as a platform when designing a new ontology |
9 | How important is this requirement to the interviewee? Required: Customer Priority/Annotationrement Analyst |
|
10 | On a scale from 1 to 3 with 1 being "not satisfied" to 3 "completely satisfied", how would you rate your overall satisfaction with the product if this requirement was met? (Relative rating/ranking of how satisfied or dissatisfied interviewee would be if this requirement were met/not met) | Select:
|
11 | Are there other requirements that you would like to share with us? I'd be more than happy to call you back another time, or if you have another 10 minutes, please share other issues you can think of. | None |
12 | Who else should we talk to in order to elicit more information about this need? | Name of contact(s) |
| For specific service enhancement or requirement from Forum entry: | |
13 | Can you or someone else give me a step-by-step description of how you would describe the expected performance/behavior of the software in order for you to feel that your requirement is met? | Well defined measurable verifiable expectation |
14 | Forum Link: | VKC or other forum where this requirement is discussed |
15 | URLs (optional): | Links to pages or applications related to this requirement |
16 | References (optional): | Links to articles, papers or presentations related to this requirement |
...
Scrollbar | ||
---|---|---|
|