Page History
Scrollbar | ||
---|---|---|
|
...
Page info | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Initial Analysis:
...
Item | Script / Question | Information/Response |
---|---|---|
1 | Hello, my name is NAME. I am calling you today because NCI and caBIG are working toward a new and improved version of the semantic infrastructure to better support integration scenarios. | If yes, proceed. If no, note a good time to call back. |
2 | What do you do? What are your goals for the next year? Why are you doing this? | Some hands on development, analysys and management and architecture - guiding development teams to implement use cases. Business Analyst, Project Manager, some development. |
3 | In interacting with the caBIG infrastructure, do you have any solution integration needs? If so, what are they? Have you envisioned new ways of interacting with existing or new parts of the semantic infrastructure? | Iterative semantics registration: The semantics don't come into play until the end of the project. You build the system then look at a few CDEs to get the picklists. At the end you sit down and write the definitions and go through the full registration process - takes long to export files and submit/review/interact with loading team. It should happen in the first iteration, they should be able to update the concepts and definitions and register it in the repository. Business analyst (the person working hands on with the implementation models), someone oversees the development of the model. The business analyst would hit the buttons' that would try to register it in the repository, and provide interactive feedback on things that don't work. It might not be the final version, but htey would have an opportunity to see the problems and issues as they develop rather than after they have implemented something. |
4 | Are there any business changes you are assuming we will be able to deal with? | Iterative development of semantics |
5 | Are there any capabilities you are expecting to be available to support your needs? | see above - abiltiy to access and reuse standard metadata fromteh infrastructure and integrating to the modeling tools more easily |
6 | Do you use any of the existing software/services? If so, what do you like or dislike about it? | Having a web based view into the semantic infrastructure, should be more user friendly. more services to retrieve content. |
7 | If this requirement is met, what would be the benefits? If you do not have it, what would be the negative impact? | Reduction in deveopment time, semantics woudl be reused in teh development process much more, will end up with greater interoperability between the applications. |
8 | If, for any reason, we were not able to create that solution, do you think there might be another way to solve this issue? Can you think of an alternative solution? | OWL and RDF may be an alternative, but does'nt remove teh need for toolsing. It may be an alternative way to represent some of this. |
9 | Would you agree that we can summarize your requirement like this? | --- |
10 | How important is this requirement to the interviewee? Required: Customer Priority/Annotationrement Analyst | Select:
|
11 | On a scale from 1 to 3 with 1 being "not satisfied" to 3 "completely satisfied", how would you rate your overall satisfaction with the product if this requirement was met? (Relative rating/ranking of how satisfied or dissatisfied interviewee would be if this requirement were met/not met) | Select:
|
12 | Are there other requirements that you would like to share with us? I'd be more than happy to call you back another time, or if you have another 10 minutes, please share other issues you can think of. | (If yes, take notes to use in on a new page with this template; if time not available now, try to make appointment for another call.) |
13 | Who else should we talk to in order to elicit more information about this need? | Josh Phillips - Semantic Bits may be able to provide more input |
| For specific service enhancement or requirement from Forum entry: | |
14 | Can you or someone else give me a step-by-step description of how you would describe the expected performance/behavior of the software in order for you to feel that your requirement is met? | See above |
15 | Forum Link: | VKC or other forum where this requirement is discussed |
16 | URLs (optional): | Links to pages or applications related to this requirement |
17 | References (optional): | cgMDR - this tools seems to be better integrated with modeling tools |
...
Scrollbar | ||
---|---|---|
|