 |
Page History
...
| # | Assigned | Description | Date Identified | Due Date | Date Completed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | Scott | To follow up on URI's on OWL2 with Harold. | on hold | |||
| 72 | Scott | Add release date to Release notes when appropriate | open | |||
| 129 | Scott | Further testing on Production around the breaking value set | open | |||
| 130 | Scott | Update 227 for flag for exceeding max clause count | open | |||
| 131 | Scott | Check the database to make sure the MOA value set entries are there | open | |||
| 132 | Scott | Fix the value set name truncation by the end of the week | open | |||
| 133 | Scott | Talk to Harold about value set versioning | open | |||
| 134 | Scott | Fix the value set truncation problem | done | |||
| 135 | Scott | Check compatibility of 6.0 and 6.1 clients against 6.1 | done | |||
| 136 | Cory/Craig | UI design | done | |||
| 139 | Scott/Cory/Craig | Face to face notes review | done |
Progress
| Immediate Priorities (Scott) | RRF Loader, CTS2 Client UI | ||
| Face To Face Followup | Distribution of Notes | ||
| 6.1 Deployment | Status | ||
| Resolved Value Sets from different Coding Scheme versions (Kim) | Scott to talk to Harold about the Resolved Value Set versioning issue. Notably they are allowed to use previous value set versions. Will need to keep previous versions of value sets for CDISC. | ||
| JIRA or GitHub for forum (Jason) | What is meant by a Sandbox | ||
| Value Set Truncation problem | Status | ||
| Confirming distributed backward compatibilities | Need to confirm that 6.0 can talk to 6.1 in distributed mode. |
...
