NIH | National Cancer Institute | NCI Wiki  

Versions Compared

Old Version 42

changes.mady.by.user Unknown User (wileyal)

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Unknown User (wileyal)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin
Scrollbar
iconsfalse

...

Page info
title
title

Anchor
ContentsofthisPage
ContentsofthisPage
Panel
titleContents of this Page
Table of Contents
minLevel2

...

Use Case Number

Init1bes4.pm10.U3

Brief Description

While it is desirable for Information Modelers to have concept selection more easily facilitated, it is also desirable for Compatibility Reviewers to have review of reused concepts and terminologies more easily facilitated.  Tooling should exist that performs side-by-side automated and manual comparison of concept reuse.

Actor(s) for this particular use case

Information Modeler

Pre-condition
The state of the system before the user interacts with it

An Information Modeler has created an information model, associated terminologies and concepts, and registered the model.

Post condition
The state of the system after the user interacts with it

The Compatibility Reviewer completes his assessment of terminology and concept reuse.

Steps to take
The step-by-step description of how users will interact with the system to achieve a specific business goal or function

  1. The Compatibility Reviewer enters the portion of the review process related to terminology and concept reuse
  2. For each reused data element, the terminologies used are presented by the review system side-by-side with those from the original data element and differences are highlighted
  3. For each reused data element, the concepts used are presented by the review system side-by-side with those from the original data element and differences are highlighted
  4. A report is automatically generated for the Compatibility Reviewer by the review system
  5. The Compatibility Reviewer is able to note potential problems with reuse as it relates to caBIG standards

Alternate Flow
Things which would prevent the normal flow of the use case

None.

Priority
The priority of implementing the use case: High, Medium or Low

Medium

Associated Links
The brief user stories, each describing the user interacts with the system for the one function only of the use case. There would potentially be a number of user stories that make up the use case.

Init1bes4 - SIW Enhancement

Fit criterion/Acceptance Criterion 
How would actor describe the acceptable usage scenarios for the software or service that meets the actor's requirement?

1.
2...

...


Scrollbar
iconsfalse