NIH | National Cancer Institute | NCI Wiki  

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

 Attendees

NameRolePresent
Wright, Larry NIH/NCI   
Fragoso, Gilberto NIH/NCI     

De Coronado, Sherri    

NIH/NCI    

Safran, Tracy

NIH/NCI [C] 
Ong, Kim L
IS 
Lucas, Jason R
IS 
Bauer, Scott  Mayo 
Stancl, Craig
Mayo 
Endle,  CoryMayo 
Wynne, Robert    NIH/NCI [C] 
Tran, Tin    NIH/NCI [C]  

Kuntipuram, Kumar

NIH/NCI [C] 
Haber, MargaretNIH/NCI
 

Action Items

AssignedDescriptionDate IdentifiedDue DateDate CompletedStatus
      

Agenda

Sprint Status

 

Current Sprint  Sprint 55 (April 27, 2017 – May 10, 2017)

16X237 Agile Development - Sprint Status#16X237AgileDevelopment-SprintStatus-Sprint55

  • Tracy mentioned that there was a CTRP meeting on Monday.
    • A request from that team is to get back limited data from the lexevs- service (instead of the entire entity).  Just FULLSYN data as an example.
DEV Blade - Update to 6.5.0 RC 1
  • Testing update
  • Moving up the tiers
  • URI Resolver (Java 1.8)

Discussion Points:

  • Jacob to install URI Resolver and CTS2 in separate containers.
  • Kim's browser testing looks good.
  • Tracy/Rob to load the latest source and then test today.
    • Kim/Jason will test with the latest source when Tracy has completed the load.

Decision Points:

  •  If everything goes well, we should be able to create a FINAL version next week.

Value Set Architecture Discussion

  • Use case for OWL expressivity

Discussion Points: 

  • Value Set Architecture
  • We had a meeting last week and another one is scheduled for this afternoon.
  • Scott asked - What is the use case that would require us to use the triple store or OWL2 API?  Do we need an OWL representation?
    • Larry suggested it could be used for concept models, role groups, and traversal.  For value sets - it was for more rich information (hierarchical)
  • Are there aspects of the OWL class that can't be stored in OWL?
    • Restrictions, Anonymous nodes are not well defined in LexEVS API.
  • LexEVS API performance may be an issue and a reason to move to OWL.
  • Larry offered a use case: Structured organization of the role relationships in the browser. They could only separate out roles that were directly attached.
    • This is associated to reasoning and OWL.
    • This is a general coding scheme issue (not necessarily associated to value sets).
  • Gilberto - We only need OWL it if we show the OWL semantics. 
    • Relationships without the anonymous nodes is faster.
    • In the value sets, we don't need the expressivity. 
    • There may be a performance penalty to navigate from a concept in a value set to another entity.

Decision Points: 

Docker - Next Steps Discussion

  • Update from recent meeting

Discussion Points:

  • The server is configured with Jenkins and Docker.
    • There are a few adjustments that are still needed.
  • Next Steps - Meet with the the systems group and work on reusable containers that have approved NCI tech stack software.

Decision Points:

Triple Store Hierarchy Discussion

Discussion Points:

  • This has already been discussed above to some extent.
  • We will need to work through more of this during our VS architecture discussion.

Decision Points:

lexgrid.org Migration

Discussion Points:

Decision Points:

  • Scott will coordinate with the NCI team when we plan to change the DNS settings for lexgrid.org.

Access to NCI Wiki Pages

  • External user access
  • Development Documents access

Discussion Points:

  • Craig was wondering if LexES Project Documents folder and sub folders should be visible to all.
    • Larry suggested these folders should be public unless there is private information.
     

Decision Points:

  • Larry requested that we check the contract to verify what is mentioned.  Does it specify that certain pages should be public?
    • Kumar will investigate what the contract contains.
  • It was decided to leave it open to the public for now.

Deployable LexEVS Containers

    • NCI Containers for deployment

Discussion Points:

  • This was discussed above.

Decision Points:

LexEVS External Users

  •  Interest in LexEVS Docker containers for deploymentF
  • caDSR content admin
    • Run queries against LexEVS and using Python (not using LexEVS Admin)

Discussion Points:

  •  Scott has sent the user in caDSR some sample code and tips on how to directly access the LexEVS DB.
  • The user is working on the UMLS.  The user wants the mappings.
    • The user wants to retrieve the semantic types for certain terms and also get the mappings.

Decision Points:

  • Scott to send the code examples to Tracy and she will add the code to the LexEVS coding examples on the wiki.
Team Absences

Mayo Team

  • Cory
  • Scott
    • April 28 - May 8
  • Craig

NCI

  • Tracy
  • Rob
  • Kim

JIRA Issues

Recent LexEVS Related Bugs and Features (within last week)

Jira
serverNCI Tracker
columnskey,summary,type,created,reporter,priority,status,versions,fixversions
maximumIssues20
jqlQueryproject = LEXEVS AND (TYPE = bug or TYPE = "new feature" or TYPE ="Improvement" or TYPE ="Inquiry") AND created >=2017-04-27 AND created <= 2017-05-10
serverId7954a81f-12da-3366-a0ef-97c806660e7c

Recent CTS2 Service Related Issues (within last week)

Jira
serverNCI Tracker
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
maximumIssues20
jqlQueryproject = LEXEVSCTS2 AND (TYPE = bug or TYPE = "new feature" or TYPE ="Improvement" or TYPE ="Inquiry" or TYPE ="Task" ) AND created >=2017-04-27 AND created <= 2017-05-10
serverId7954a81f-12da-3366-a0ef-97c806660e7c

6.4 LexEVS Related Issues

Jira
serverNCI Tracker
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
maximumIssues20
jqlQueryproject in (LEXEVS) AND fixVersion = 6.4 ORDER BY priority DESC
serverId7954a81f-12da-3366-a0ef-97c806660e7c

6.4 CTS2 Service Related Issues

Jira
serverNCI Tracker
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
maximumIssues20
jqlQueryproject = LEXEVSCTS2 AND fixVersion in ("CTS2 Service 1.5.2", "CTS2 Service 1.5.1.1", "CTS2 Service 1.5.1.2") OR fixVersion = "VS Client 1.1"
serverId7954a81f-12da-3366-a0ef-97c806660e7c

Project Plan Changes

#DescriptionDue DateResourcesNotesRisksMitigation
 None     
       
       

 Planned Activities

Area of InterestDetails
  
  
  

Risks, Issues, Dependencies

Risks

Opened DateDue DateDescriptionLikelihood (H, M, L)ImpactAssignedStatusMitigation Strategy
         
         

Issues

 #Opened DateDescriptionImpactAssignedStatus
      
      
      

Dependencies

Opened DateDescriptionAssigned
   
   

 

Action Item Backlog

 #AssignedDescriptionDate IdentifiedDue DateDate CompletedStatus