 |
Page History
...
The Ontology White Paper describes the development of an ontology specifically to meet the needs of the Nano Working Group, the NanoParticle Ontology. It also describes other ontology, terminology and related standards efforts in the community.
The Minimum Information Standards
...
that minimum information standards (MIS) (MIS) White Paper articulates that MIS are required for two very different sets of experiments:the set of experiments using nanoparticles to determine biological activity
...
and the set of experiments characterizing the chemical composition and physical properties of the particle.
...
The clear scope statement developed at the Nano F2F, has ended up buried inside a sentence (bottom of page 8) inside a paragraph; and overall is a lost opportunity.
The paper also articulates the need for community building and why MIS must emerge from a broader community effort . In addition, the paper demonstrates:
...
that must include: an increased awareness of the relevant activities beyond caBIG, caNanoLab and NCL
...
and a compare and contrast and to identify complementary and overlapping efforts.
...
This paper may be useful in communication with and outreach to other groups in an effort to build that community of interest.
The paper provides three scenarios to demonstrate the kinds of activities going on in the Nano community: finding an appropriate NP delivery system, in vitro profiling of nanomaterial toxicity, NPO evaluation and enrichment. MIS MIS will allow integration of data enabling :
...
informed decision making and repurposing of platforms by having the relevant facts in hand
...
and the combination of large scale data sets for analysis and prediction.
These papers have sections There is also a section of the paper dedicated to caNanoLab. The caNanoLab can be a portal to other information since it is a platform for sharing and collating results. The collaborative nature of the NCLNano Characterization Lab, caNanoLab and NPO was is noted and there is anticipation that this effort will continue to mature.
Finally, the paper comes to the conclusion that development of MIS is beyond the scope of this small group, but there is a long list of specific and actionable recommendations that may prove quite useful in the next program year.
