 |
Page History
...
What went well
| Description | Author |
|---|---|
Did an incredible work in short time. Hannah’s work is incredible. Getting good design direction. | Dimitri |
Communication is well | Kevin |
| User Interface design is well done communicating the intent of the application. | Mark |
| Communication went well. | Yizhen |
| Team performance is has improved. | Matt |
| Everything went well. | Sri Kiran |
| Collaboration went well. | Vincent |
| Everything went well. | Ajay |
Team collaboration went well. Team dynamics is good. | Amit |
Presentation is feature rich. Team presentation is focused. | John |
| Team is very cooperative. | Siva |
What could have gone better?
| Description | Author |
|---|---|
Coordination between dev and QA. Changes made in dev is not communicated to QA. | Laxmi |
| Review user stories by Developers | Philip |
Implement a process to do a status check of use cases during implementation Request for JIRA permission to move tickets into different permission | Dimitri |
Communication with DCF team needs to be improved. Index processing is to be improved. | Ming |
| Contact Codacy to clarify the react.js security code compliance report | Sri Kiran |
| Suggest to review use cases in QA meeting | Afag |
| Coordination with QA. | Ajay |
DCF communication needs to be improved. Cloud One communication needs to be improved. | Amit |
Tickets
| Jira | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
