Date
19 Aug 2015
Participants
Unknown User (stanclcr2)
Bauer, Scott (NIH/NCI) [C]
Unknown User (endlecm)
Retrospective
What did we do well?
Estimates were good and were able to add extra tasks to the sprint.
Kept support issues contained.
Peer programming provides ability to review code together. Works better when not researching in the code.
What should we have done better?
Structure peer programming in a way that is more efficient (Scott to have prep time).
Actions
@mention a person to assign them an action item