Attendees

NameRolePresent
Haber, MargaretNIH/NCI
x
Fragoso, Gilberto NIH/NCI     

De Coronado, Sherri    

NIH/NCI   x

Safran, Tracy

NIH/NCI [C] 
Ong, Kim L
ISx
Lucas, Jason R
ISx
Bauer, Scott  Mayox
Stancl, Craig
Mayox
Endle,  CoryMayox
Wynne, Robert    NIH/NCI [C]x

Kuntipuram, Kumar

NIH/NCI [C] 
Mensah, JacobNIH/NCI [C]x
Trong, TracyNIH/NCI [C] 
Din, SanaNIH/NCI [C] 
Kisler, BronNIH/NCI [C] 
Remennik, LyubovNIH/CC/BTRISx

Action Items

AssignedDescriptionDate IdentifiedDue DateDate CompletedStatus
      

Agenda

EVS Weekly Tech Meeting

Discussion Points:

  • LexEVS
    • Updates for DEV system to be configured to run Docker containers.
      • Jacob is testing Docker implementation.
    • CTS2 on-line documentation is running on NCI Dev system and Heroku.
      • redis server is not needed. This ticket was cancelled.
      • Ticket submitted for setting Jenkins to build/deploy on all of the tiers.
        • Jacob is working on this issue as well.
    • Lexevs-system-tests - updates in progress due to centos7_tomcat image different than standard unbunto image.
      • Jenkins and Docker - users and permissions.
      • Margaret suggested resurfacing this issue at the next Monday meeting.
  • Browser/Tools
  • Data
  • Systems
  • Triple Store/EVS API

Decision Points:

Roll Call 

Sprint Status

 

Current Sprint  Sprint 74 (January 18, 2018 – January 31, 2018)

16X237 Agile Development - Sprint Status#16X237AgileDevelopment-SprintStatus-Sprint74

API Meeting/Discussion Update

Discussion Points:

  • Bron and Tracy are out today.
  • Scott gave a quick overview of the last meeting.  Much of the time was discussing and documenting the existing architecture.
  • Margaret suggested this meeting should include requirements gathering and gap determination as well as day to day needs.

Decision Points:

  • Scott will send a link to the slides to Margaret and Lyubov.

Empty value sets - Update (Rob)

Discussion Points:

  •  VS have loaded last night on Dev.
  • Should we load empty VS?  Rob suggested that it may be OK.
    • The browser should be able to handle an empty VS.

Decision Points:

Resolved Value Set rework

Discussion Points:

  • Resolved VS were persisted in the past.  They are now dynamically resolved (without being persisted).
  • VS definitions are still be persisted to the system.
  • We depend upon the resolved VS for the existing CTS2 REST API.
    • The lexevs resolved value set API will need to be updated to still return the resolved value sets.
  • The VS search API will change (source asserted API).  The browser will need to use the new API.

Decision Points:

  • Rob suggested that this scenario should work:
    • Browser - If multiple value sets are selected, and one is empty, the browser should still get results back.
    • If a user clicks on the empty value set in the hierarchy, they should be able to see the value set information and an empty value set.
      • The user currently see a "null" response.
     

LexEVS External Users

Discussion Points:

  • caDSR - LexEVS REST vs Java API discussion on Friday.

Decision Points:

Team Absences

Mayo Team

  • Cory -
  • Scott -
  • Craig -

NCI

  • Tracy - 1/29 - 2/6
  • Rob - 2/13-3/6
  • Bron -
  • Sana -
  • Kim -

JIRA Issues

Recent LexEVS Related Bugs and Features (within last week)

Recent CTS2 Service Related Issues (within last week)

6.5 LexEVS Related Issues

6.5 CTS2 Service Related Issues

Project Plan Changes

#DescriptionDue DateResourcesNotesRisksMitigation
 None     
       
       

 Planned Activities

Area of InterestDetails
  
  
  

Risks, Issues, Dependencies

Risks

Opened DateDue DateDescriptionLikelihood (H, M, L)ImpactAssignedStatusMitigation Strategy
         
         

Issues

 #Opened DateDescriptionImpactAssignedStatus
      
      
      

Dependencies

Opened DateDescriptionAssigned
   
   

 

Action Item Backlog

 #AssignedDescriptionDate IdentifiedDue DateDate CompletedStatus