Attendees

NameRolePresent
Remennik, LyubovNIH/NCIx

De Coronado, Sherri    

NIH/NCI   x

Safran, Tracy

NIH/NCI [C]x
Ong, Kim L
ISx
Lucas, Jason R
ISx
Bauer, Scott  Mayox
Stancl, Craig
Mayox
Endle,  CoryMayox
Wynne, Robert    NIH/NCI [C]x

Kuntipuram, Kumar

NIH/NCI [C]x
Kisler, BronNIH/NCI [C]x

Agenda

Use Case - MedDRA (LexEVS-3661)

Discussion Points:

  • Import MedDRA into LexEVS and export coding scheme as RDF files and load into StarDog.
  • The LexEVS exporter currently exports to OWL  (not OWL2)
  • Sherri mentioned that Mark Musen has a RRF -> RDF converter that NCI could potentially use

Decision Points:

  • Action Item: NCI agreed to put this issue on hold and see if the direct converter will work for them.
JIRA Issue: LexEVS-3905 - Inconsistent value set URIs are returned by different API methods.

Discussion Points:

Decision Points:

  • Action Item: NCI agreed that this issue should be fixed.
JIRA Issue: LexEVS-3464 - Loader: Sources for Properties are not loaded for Meta Thesaurus

Discussion Points:

Decision Points:

  • Action Item: Scott will finish up and review with NCI team and authors.
JIRA Issue: LexEVS-3616 - Loader: Truncated role qualifiers in Ontology for Biobanking

Discussion Points:

  • A DB column would need to be increased. 
  • All DBs would need to be reloaded (could be from a dump)
  • This Biobanking load is only loaded on DEV currently, so the upper tiers would not need to be reloaded.
  • The DB definition/model in LexEVS will need to be updated.  
  • This change could be put in a patch.

Decision Points:

  • Action Item: NCI agreed this should be worked on.
Remote API

Discussion Points:

  • Editors, Kim and caDSR are currently using the remote API.  
  • There are serialization issues when changes are made.  This is complicated maintenance.
  • Long term is to sunset the remote api.  
  • Long term - Remote api would need to be replaced by some REST services.

Decision Points:

Browser Requirements

Discussion Points:

  • Browser review will be tomorrow with Kim.

Decision Points:

  • Action Item: Review all of the browsers and determine requirement
Cancer Data Aggregator

Discussion Points:

  • Sherri brought up the Cancer Data Aggregator about the need to do mappings and direction to needed vocabularies.  If someone needs diagnostic information it knows to go to SNOMED, for drugs it knows to go to here, etc.
  • She also mentioned a sample query of “Give me all the patients that have been treated with a platinum compound.”

Decision Points:

Microservices discussion

Discussion Points:

Decision Points:

  • Action Item: Lyuba suggested having a separate meeting to understand micro services and how this might fit in with LexEVS
Face to Face Meeting from last year (2017)

Discussion Points:

Decision Points:

  • Action Item: Bron suggested Mayo team reviewing the minutes and see if there are any important issues that should be followed up on.
  • Action Item: Bron to re-start the API group architecture