Creating datatype mapping
Use Case Number |
UMLSD1 |
---|---|
Brief Description |
One persons object is another person's attribute". Depending on ones world view, a real life entity can be modeled in UML as Object, Attribute or value set. In caBIG models now, some model Race (and Ethnicity) as an Object while others model Race (and Etnicty ) as an attribute. This is problematic, because Race data that is modeled differently cannot be "seamlessly integrated" on caGrid (there needs to be a transform). |
Actor(s) for this particular use case |
DataData Curators |
Pre-condition |
The various data formats along with their pluses and minuses are known |
Post condition |
A direct mapping is created between an agreed upon, standard format and any other format used in the healthcare settings |
Steps to take |
1.Curators identify various datatype formats (A,B, C and X ) that are used to represent data in various tools |
Alternate Flow |
None |
Priority |
Medium |
Associated Links |
--- |
Fit criterion/Acceptance Criterion |
A granular mapping is created between an agreed upon standard format and any other format used in the healthcare settings |
Interoperability across various platforms
Use Case Number |
UMLSD2 |
---|---|
Brief Description |
The below listed use case describes the interoperability scenarios in the various healthcare applications for a query that is launched from a 'platform immaterial' tool |
Actor(s) for this particular use case |
Cancer Researcher |
Pre-condition |
1. There is a very granular mapping that exists between the data format used by the source application and an agreed upon standard data format. |
Post condition |
Actors gets the data of interest in the format that his tool understands |
Steps to take |
1.Actor fires a query using his source application in a format A |
Alternate Flow |
None |
Priority |
Medium |
Associated Links |
--- |
Fit criterion/Acceptance Criterion |
Actors gets the data of interest in the format that his tool understands |