Pre Interview:
Item |
Information/Response |
---|---|
Date: |
12/09/2009 |
Requirement # unique id <SemCon Ops Initiative>.<analysts initials><requirement number> |
Init1hm2 |
Originator/Customer's Name: |
Juli Klemm |
Originator/Customer's Company: |
NCI |
Stakeholder Community:
|
|
Summary of requirement pre-interview, by Reviewer: |
Dynamic extensions are used to dynamically add additional data elements to an information model that is already underlying an application. It is highly desirable that these new data elements are publishable to the metadata repository in a dynamic way that does not require much manual information (e.g. UML modeling) from the application owner. |
Recommended Next Step Enter one: Follow-up interview, Observe, Use Case Template (text), Use Case Model (formalized/UML diagram), Group Discussion, Prototype, Waiting Room |
Follow-up interview |
Interview
Item |
Script / Question |
Information/Response |
---|---|---|
1 |
Hello, my name is NAME. I am calling you today because NCI and caBIG are working toward a new and improved version of the semantic infrastructure to better support integration scenarios. |
Yes. |
2 |
Do you have any solution integration needs? If so, what are they? Have you envisioned new ways of interacting with existing or new parts of the semantic infrastructure? |
The possible solutions for the dynamic extension are as follows:
|
3 |
Are there any business changes you are assuming we will be able to deal with? |
Focusing more to developing browsers for reusing and creating metadata elements
|
4 |
Are there any capabilities you are expecting to be available to support your needs? |
Federated metadata repository browsers |
5 |
Do you use any of the existing software/services? If so, what do you like or dislike about it? |
No. |
6 |
If this requirement in met, what would be the benefits? If you do not have it, what would be the negative impact? |
Currently, we can not share data that are created through the dynamic extension on the Grid. If this requirement in met, users can query and retrieve real time data on the Grid. |
7 |
If, for any reason, we were not able to create that solution, do you think there might be another way to solve this issue? Can you think of an alternative solution? |
No. |
8 |
Would you agree that we can summarize your requirement like this? |
Create federated metadata/terminology repository. |
9 |
How important is this requirement to the interviewee? Required: Customer Priority/Annotationrement Analyst |
Must have |
10 |
On a scale from 1 to 3 with 1 being "not satisfied" to 3 "completely satisfied", how would you rate your overall satisfaction with the product if this requirement was met? (Relative rating/ranking of how satisfied or dissatisfied interviewee would be if this requirement were met/not met) |
Completely satisfied |
11 |
Are there other requirements that you would like to share with us? I'd be more than happy to call you back another time, or if you have another 10 minutes, please share other issues you can think of. |
(If yes, take notes to use in on a new page with this template; if time not available now, try to make appointment for another call.) |
12 |
Who else should we talk to in order to elicit more information about this need? |
No |
|
For specific service enhancement or requirement from Forum entry: |
|
13 |
Can you or someone else give me a step-by-step description of how you would describe the expected performance/behavior of the software in order for you to feel that your requirement is met? |
Create federated metadata repository: create new data elements through dynamic extension. The federated CDE browser will allow users to query these CDEs on the grid |
14 |
Forum Link: |
https://cabig-kc.nci.nih.gov/Vocab/forums/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=151 |
15 |
URLs (optional): |
related to the ICRi use cases 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,13, and 15. |
16 |
References (optional): |
Links to articles, papers or presentations related to this requirement |