Date
Attendees
- Musk, Philip (NIH/NCI) [C]
- Kim, Erika (NIH/NCI) [E]
- Unknown User (wak11@duke.edu.commons)
- Unknown User (dearry)
- William Hendricks
Goals
- Review, discuss and prioritize ICDC study submission proposals
Discussion items
| Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| New UBC study | Musk, Philip (NIH/NCI) [C] |
|
Minutes (Not Verbatim)
PM- The purpose of this meeting is to take a look at the study submissions and figure out whether or not this is the type of study we want to have in ICDC. If we are in a time crunch in terms of onboarding the dataset we should still ascribe a priority. We do have a new study submission coming from Debbie Knapp that came in last week on Thursday. The requirements are to assign an accession number to a study and a designated status of the dataset. Erika got the designated prefixes set up at identifiers.org. Of the 2 Purdue studies, one is very close to having the embargo lifted. The journal said as part of your manuscript can you give us a pointer to where the data would be published and we supplied an accession that is a pointer to the data commons.
PM- We can now handle any biobanking activity with our multi-study matching feature
Voting ocurred on the new UBC study
WK- As a user, I would like to see an anticipated embargo release date. Perhaps, we can just add a value to indicate the reason a study is under embargo
Action items
- Musk, Philip (NIH/NCI) [C] to check in through email to determine if the next meeting time works for August 2nd and August 16th
- Musk, Philip (NIH/NCI) [C]& Kuffel, Gina (NIH/NCI) [C] to determine if it would make sense to add a metadata field to capture the "Anticipated Release Date"
