Date
Attendees
Rajesh, Erika, Anand, Gilberto Fragoso, Henry Rodriguez, Karen Ketchum, Michael Holck, Paul Rudnick, Mike MacCoss, Deepak
Goals
- Continuing discussion on the Scientific committee
- PDC portal analytics
- Next dataset release
- CPTAC3 Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LSCC) - mid July.
- Other items
- Input/Feedback from stakeholders
Discussion items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scientific Committee | Mike MacCoss | If no objections to list, will start inviting. Reviewed list. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FWKEouR1YddsyiFQOjjCfJj_gu5witQmi2zzMDBjKQE/edit?ts=5ec6f221. Erika asked for list of members from last committee. Rajesh will send. Erika suggests we add someone with multi-omics/genomics experience. Revisit in 2 weeks after everyone has had chance to review list. | |
| Google Analytics | Rajesh | Showed PowerPoint. Weekly Visits, users, pageviews, pages/session, avg. session duration, bounce rate (lower the better) - users who come, but don't navigate further. Looked at country distribution. Also showed landmarks timeline. Mike MacCoss interrupted Henry as he was asking about how to know if these statistics are valuable (concern about relationship). If someone is taking the content from PDC, how do we know if they are crediting us? License for the data - CCBY. How to count on another portal that they've used data from the PDC portal? Spent the majority of time on analytics. More discussion of license and may need a more detailed discussion. How do we ensure the data that gets released gets credit without creating a huge burden? | |
| LSCC | Rajesh | Identified next study to be released. | |
| Other Items | Rajesh | Henry asked about download issues with HNSCC. Mike Holck addressed - pushed new version of portal. Access keys rotated per normal process. Code went back to old access key (cached value) - unknown as to why. Replicated on Stage and updated script to force update of keys in code. Added to test group that a push to prod tests download standard. | |
| Feedback from NCI Stakeholders | All | Henry doesn't feel he's a stakeholder, but the community. Has PDC thought of putting together a focus group of users not familiar with the website to get feedback? MacCoss thought that was a good idea also to get more contribution of data. Involve Scientific Committee in figuring out best approach to tackle this problem. Paul mentioned recording users and understanding how they work. Erika mentioned that CRDC has been launched as MVP (soft launch). Looking for feedback. Public announcement will be next week. |
Action items
- Rajesh to send list of previous scientific committee members.
