Page History
...
Page info |
---|
...
|
Meeting Information
Time | 1:00 |
---|
...
- |
...
3:00 |
...
PM | |
Date | 03/31/2010 |
---|
...
Location | NCI conference room and telecon |
---|
Lead: Joshua Phillips and Bea Mahious
Attendees
Team Member | Organization |
---|---|
Dave Hau | NCI CBIIT |
Greg Raley | NCI CBIIT |
Denis Advic | NCI CBIIT |
Raghu Chintal | NCI CBIIT |
Joshua Phillips | SemanticBits |
Beate Mahious | SemanticBits |
Patrick McConnell | SemanticBits |
Ram Chilukuri | SemanticBits |
Tom Digre | SemanticBits |
Alan Blair | SemanticBits |
Meeting Agenda
1. Review of Sprint 1
2. Planning Sprint 2
Meeting Minutes
1. Review of Sprint 1
Joshua Phillips reviewed the project plan, deliverables, and milestones - we are on track
Items that went well and went poorly:
- Joshua: we didn't get the team together quickly enough, made good progress on the UML modeling, we should be able to reuse the approach to ECCF that the caEHR team is taking
- Tom: prototype came along more slowly than expected because the technology stack was a little bit in flux, made good progress on modeling, BDA does not yet support OSGI target development
- Patrick: we were slow to get the vision/scope together, progress too slow on SRS and Use Cases, but content good; wiki content and structure is good, but thinks that the ECCF templates are not finalized
- Beate: would have liked to spend more time to go through planning meetings so that we have exact dates and timelines for future meetings/tasks, it is good that we are integrating with the Con Ops team, great progress on UML/prototype, good to merge with caDSR team early
- Ram: more planning meetings would have been helpful to flesh out items, good progress overall
- Alan: new to the team
- Dave: we are a little behind in the project plan, some of this is a moving target (like ECCF), we should communicate more with other specification teams (like w/ Raghu on ECCF), we may need to interpret these standards to fit our needs (e.g. ECCF), need to keep an Agile mindset and process due to the nature of the project
2. Planning Sprint 2
Jira will be used for task tracking
- We should keep an eye on the Jira deployment at NCI to make sure we are compatible when it comes online
- A weekly export to SVN should not be a problem
- Everyone should log in and select the tasks they can complete in this sprint
Requirements will be covered more by use cases than activity diagrams (per experience with caEHR project)
We will need to define specifically what the interoperability inter-registry requirements are in order to determine the standards to select
Our requirements and use cases should not focus on current functionality, but instead desired functionality
-> See attachment for Sprint 2 backlog.
Action Items
Name Responsible | Action Item | Date Due | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Bea Mahious | enter Sprint 2 backlog into JIRA and inform software engineers to pick their own tasks for Sprint 2. | 3/31/2010 | done |
Bea Mahious | Talk to Kumar about weekly export to SVN | 4/2/2010 | — |