Page History
Scrollbar | ||
---|---|---|
|
Wiki Markup |
---|
{scrollbar:icons=false} |
...
Section | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
In addition, however, some form of concept resolution is required for Rules Management. Determination of the semantic equivalence of concept expressions means that information model primitives to be matched share an underlying ontology, or have access to a cross-ontology mapping (a driver for Initiative 5). ISO 19763 is a framework in which domain-specific ontology is used to provide semantics for policy and rule expression. Refer to RGPS Metamodel Framework for Interaction Between Cloud and Client presentation
Multiexcerpt include | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This would limit the ability of the Rules Management service to recognize equivalent concepts expressions to contexts in which the business case for creation of expensive maps is justified or in which regulation requires all to use a single terminology. However there may be opportunities to use machine learning or other software engineering techniques and frameworks to reduce the burden of manual ontology mapping, or to use federated ontologies to largely escape the need for maps. Therefore this Initiative will also include limited testing and analysis of alternative approaches to making Concept Resolution more semantically capable and less dependent on expensive mapping activities, although its applicability and usefulness in a Policy and Rules environment may be limited due to the very nature of the need for precise interpretation of contracts.
...
Initiative 3 - Rules management and contracts support (behavioral semantics)
...
Include Page | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Scrollbar | ||
---|---|---|
|