NIH | National Cancer Institute | NCI Wiki  

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Panel
titleContents of this Page
Table of Contents
minLevel2

Introduction to CTIIP

If you were the patient, wouldn't you want your medical team to benefit from data collected about your cancer, no matter which discipline it belonged to?

Most cancer diagnoses are made based on images. You have to see a tumor, or compare images of it over time, to determine its level of threat. Ultrasounds, MRIs, and X-rays are all common types of images that radiologists use to collect information about a patient and perhaps cause a doctor to recommend a biopsy. Once that section of the tumor is under the microscope, pathologists learn more about it. To gather even more information, a doctor may order a genetic panel. If that panel shows that the patient has a genetic anomaly, the doctor may search for clinical trials that match it, or turn to therapies that researchers have already proven effective for this combination of tumor and genetic anomaly through recent advances in precision medicine.

...

Each of these diagnostic images are at a different scale, from a different scientific discipline. A large-scale image like an X-ray may be almost life-size. Slices of tumors are smaller still. Like genes and proteins, you must put them on a slide under a microscope to see them. Not surprisingly, each of these image types require specialized knowledge to create, handle, and interpret them. While complementary, each specialist comes from a different scientific discipline.If you were the patient, wouldn't you want your medical team to benefit from data collected about your cancer, no matter which discipline it belonged to?

The good news is that it is now possible to both create large databases of information about images and apply existing data standards. The bad news is that each of these databases is protected by proprietary formats that do not communicate with one another, and standards do not yet exist for all image types. Researchers from each of the disciplines under the umbrella called imaging refer to the images in a unique way, using different vocabulary. Wouldn't it be nice if a scientist could simply ask questions without regard to disciplinary boundaries and harness all of the available data about tissue, cells, genes, proteins, and other parts of the body to prove or disprove a hypothesis?

...