Author: [LexEVS Team/Craig Stancl]
Email: [stancl.craig@mayo.edu]
Team: [LexEVS]
Contract: [N/A]
Client: NCI CBIIT
National Institutes of Heath
US Department of Health and Human Services
Sign off |
Date |
Role |
CBIIT or Stakeholder Organization |
Reviewer's Comments (If disapproved indicate specific areas for improvement.) |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this document is to collect loader topic discussion and resolution for [LexEVS]. The focus is on the processing of source content as loaded into LexEVS terminology server proposed by the stakeholders and target users to make a better product.
Loader Topics
Control the setting of isActive via Loader preferences
GForge |
Issue |
Resolution |
---|---|---|
Different vocabs have their own way of determining whether a concept is active or not. For OWL we can use Deprecated status. For OBO or RRF we don't have that. We would like to be able to specify what method a vocab is using to indicate deprecated concepts in the loader preferences. |
TBD |
Discussion
Examine use of LexBIG entity status
GForge |
Issue |
Resolution |
---|---|---|
The entity status for concepts should use a designated set of statuses that are mappable across vocabularies. For example: |
TBD |