NIH | National Cancer Institute | NCI Wiki  

Error rendering macro 'rw-search'

null

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Document Information

Author: [LexEVS Team/Craig Stancl]
Email: [stancl.craig@mayo.edu]
Team: [LexEVS]
Contract: [N/A]
Client: NCI CBIIT
National Institutes of Heath
US Department of Health and Human Services

Contents

Sign off

Date

Role

CBIIT or Stakeholder Organization

Reviewer's Comments (If disapproved indicate specific areas for improvement.)

 


 


 

 


 


 

 


 


 

The purpose of this document is to collect loader topic discussion and resolution for [LexEVS]. The focus is on the processing of source content as loaded into LexEVS terminology server proposed by the stakeholders and target users to make a better product.

Loader Topics

Control the setting of isActive via Loader preferences

GForge

Issue

Resolution

26329

Different vocabs have their own way of determining whether a concept is active or not. For OWL we can use Deprecated status. For OBO or RRF we don't have that. We would like to be able to specify what method a vocab is using to indicate deprecated concepts in the loader preferences.

Example:
For this vocabulary if the property X has the value Y then the isActive should be set to false.

Or, more complicated: Any concepts treed underneath concept Z should be considered inactive.

TBD

Discussion

Examine use of LexBIG entity status

GForge

Issue

Resolution

26709

The entity status for concepts should use a designated set of statuses that are mappable across vocabularies. For example:
Mayo and collaborators determine that there will be 4 available statuses; "Active_Concept",
"Provisional_Concept", "Antiquated_Concept", "Retired_Concept". The loader will be programmed
to use a preferences file that will allow users to specify how these statuses will be assigned to the various concepts
for the various vocabularies.

TBD

Discussion

  • No labels