NIH | National Cancer Institute | NCI Wiki  

Error rendering macro 'rw-search'

null

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 35 Next »

Contents

Supplemental Page for Requirements Gathering

Requirements planning for next generation semantics infrastructure 

This page is linked to the caBIG VKC Semantic Infrastructure pages as a gateway into requirements gathering and related materials for the next generation semantic infrastructure for caBIG®. The semantics computing capabilities to support interoperability in an SOA demand enhancements and new infrastructure to support the vision described below. This page contains links to the related documents and projects tied to development of new capabilities.

The process we are following is: 

1) Review Forum postings (from the caBIG community at large, which we want to encourage)
2) Initial prioritization of requirements
3) Conduct more formal requirements (using template) by Requirements Analysts base don review of postings and other requirements from stakeholders
4) Conduct Very formal use cases and requirements (by Business Analysts) 

5)  Build test and acceptance plans for new infrastructure components including ensuring that ECCF artifacts and reviews

Vocabulary Knowledge Center Semantics Requirements Forum (VKC)

The community was asked to tell us what their requirements are for the next generation infrastructure and the VKC Semantics Requirement Forum was created for this purpose. Please feel free to visit the site and comment or contirbute additional ideas.

ICR Requirements are here

Background

The Semantic Infrastructure and Operations Group is responsible for the semantic aspects of the CORE Program Area, the caBIG® Vocabulary and Common Data Elements Workspace, and certain aspects of the caBIG Architecture Workspace, and caGrid®.

The activities of the NCI CBIIT Semantics and Operations Group fall into three areas:

  • Content Management - the processes and procedures that ensure the breadth and quality of the metadata and terminology used to record the semantics of data meet the needs of the caBIG® community.
  • Semantics Infrastructure - design and development of  software resources and operations including producing reference implementations of platform independent models
  • Semantics Architecture and Management - defining the platform independent (as also called "implementation Independent") specification for systems and processes required to meet the semantics needs of the CBIIT/caBIG enterprise, and for assuring that operational requirements for semantics support are met ina timely and reliable way.

Our vision is to provide computational and human interpretable representation of the meaning and context of data and services. Realization of this goal is a vital to enable the caBIG® community to revolutionize biomedical research, personalized medicine, and integrated care.  To achieve this vision, the semantic infrastructure must:

-          Continue to provide caBIG with computationally tractable representations of the meaning and representation of data, and to extend semantic support to analytic and other services so that they can be discovered, understood, and securely utilized.

-          Utilize a consistent, comprehensive information management discipline and software engineering standards such as ISO 10746 RM-ODP and its companion standard UML4ODP ISO 19793 to define both enterprise semantics needs and implementation neutral solutions to meet those needs.

-          Provide reference implementations of enterprise-level platform independent models addressing semantic needs, especially the need for behavioral semantics. 

-          Reduce the level of effort associated with creation of semantic information, in part by leveraging to the greatest extent possible automated approaches to harvest semantics information from line of business and software engineering activities

Metadata management for Semantics Support

The semantic model and infrastructure forms a key component of the caBIG® collaborative infrastructure. The current semantic infrastructure uses a modified version of ISO 11179 Ed2, which formed the seeds for the development of ISO 11179 Ed3, and is the central component in allowing data elements and models to be annotated with concepts, and curated and registered in a repository allowing lookup and retrieval by both end-users and applications.  It enables the automatic integration and transformations of data for sharing and collaboration by provisioning the infrastructure with clear, computable, and unambiguous data descriptors for those who would create software that can use and interpret the data in the service of cancer research. 

The goals of the next generation infrastructure is to make these capabilities available to everyone with coarser grained services that require little or no knowledge of the complexities of the infrastrucdrture in order to gain its benefits.

Two additional opportunities for improvement in the current infrastrucrture approach are:

1) simplify the creation of this metadata which is currently labor intensive and therefore does not scale well

2) expand the approach beyond data discovery and interchange, to inlcude services interoperability

Interested Parties? Stakeholders in New Semantic Infrastructure

The key to success for the next generation infrastructure is defining the critical, unmet semantic interoperability usage scenarios to ensure that the right next generation of services and infrastructure are provisioned.  With the help of Mayo Clinic through the caBIG Vocabulary Knowledge Center a wiki to support requirements gathering is being organized to collect and report on requirements.  

Interested parties are encouraged to become involved over the next few months as we attempt to characterize in more detail the requirements to achieve the interoperability vision.

Primary Users

See Semantic Infrastructure Stakeholder Page on VKC wiki for more complete description of stakeholders.

The primary direct and indirect end users include:

  • Software and Application designers and architects
  • Software and Application engineers and developers
  • Scientific and medical researchers
  • Medical research protocol designers
  • Clinical and scientific research data managers
  • Clinicians
  • Patients
  • Medical research study participants 

Requirements materials attached to this wiki page have been received from the following groups and are being used to supplement the requirements described on the VKC wiki:

Stakeholder

Contact

Analyst

Area of Interest

Usage/Primary Interaction Scenarios

Clinical Governance Group

John Speakman CTMS Wiki - Storyboards and Semantic Profiles for services interoperabilty

 

ScenPro Analyst and 5AM, ISO Datatype Documentation of ISO use for COPPA (all projects have to use the datatypes) Implementation of guidelines must be complete in June

1. Support for 'operationalized' ISO 21090 Datatypes
2. Discover and share/reuse models 
3. Rules engine and repository:
Scenario #8: Management of Routine Non-Laboratory-Based Adverse Events (caAERS and CDMS) - Protocol Metadata and Rules Engine
4. C3PR FR-230 The system must integrate with the Cancer Data Standards Repository (caDSR) and Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS) (e.g. for eligibility criteria)

MediData

(Dianne Reeves)

 

Data Elements on Forms: Metadata registry information and semantic metadata, specifically data elements (CDEs) to record and share centrally defined forms variables that can be used to customize new protocols for clinical trials

1. Share Forms including form structure, behavior and variables - similar to the way C3D uses caDSR but may have additional metadata that needs to be stored/shared

Genzyme

Sue Dubman

 

MDR metadata exchange -->Implement global data standards to collect, process, analyze and report clinical research data throughout the entire product lifecycle  (see GetSmart attachement)

1. share data standards and variables (CDEs)
2. Get Smart Goal #2 Data Collection and Processing: Technology enabled standard Case Report Forms and edit checks.

3. Get Smart Goal #5 Core Infrastructure: Data Elements Dictionary, Validation Tools, Systems Interoperability Guidelines and Architecture, Metadata Repository, Mapping and Conversion Tools and Structured Authoring Tool

Medical and Scientific Researchers

Yolanda Gill

 

Workflow: Metadata and rule support

1. Metadata to support workflow rules

MD Anderson

Mike Riben

 

Alignment/Interoperability between NCI and MD Anderson's metadata and vocabulary solutions; Possible UAT(See MD Anderson Attachment)


Emory

Stuart Turner, Eliot Seigel and Joel Saltz

 

Semantic interoperation req't stemming from the TCGA Radiology and In Silico projects. Use case with 4 semantic requirements identified.

 

Novartis

Mehta Saurin

 

MDR tools
ie.
1) Alternate names for permissible values i.e. currently you can register 'M', 'MALE' but we would like to register additional name such as 'm', '1', 'Male' etc.
2) Additional attributes for a data element - although there is a reference field available we would want (for operational purposes) additional attributes to define items such as 'SAS format', display format etc.
3) if the list of permissible values is Extensible flag
4) A way to relate data elements to each other
5) Distributed repository

 

CDISC and SHARE

Margaret Haber

 

Semantic Media Wiki for harmonizing and updating data elements; Input on tooling and metadata extensions

 

Mayo

Robert Friemuth

 

new metadata repository and CTS2


LS Governance and ICR

Juli Klemm, Baris

 

caB2B IRWG requirements, caBIG Gene Pattern and Analytical Services interoperability.
Seamless interoperability, discover services and data that can be combined; construct new workflows 

1. Integrated system of tools (see IRWG Requirements)

2. Support workflow authoring tools (such as Taverna and caB2B)

Terminologists

Margaret Haber, Sheri De Coronado

 

formal requirements for the new terminology and metadata services and for assessing equivalence between pre- and post- coordinated terminology


caBIG Community

Various

 

Vocabulary Knowledge Center Semantic Requirements Wiki Forum

 

Software Architects and Designers

Anand Basu
Charlie Mead

 

Discover and integrate services, on the fly, to perform scientific research

1. build new services that can interact with other existing services using workflow authoring tools such as Taverna
2. Support for "Conformance Profiles" --> Profiles are a mechanism used to constrain broader service capabilities to meet specific functional needs identified within a domain or locality (See Conformance Profiles attachment)

Metadata Curators

Dianne Reeves

 

Creating new content in caDSR

1. Customizable metadata download
2. Clinician friendly browsing: improve search and browsing functions, leveraging existing semantics and metadata
3. Improve ability to organize and reuse content (Classifications) with batch upload/editing

FDA

Margaret Haber

 

Metadata and Terminologies

TBD

caEHR

 

 

 

 

NHIN

 

 

 

 



  • No labels