Author: LexEVS Team/Craig Stancl
Email: stancl.craig@mayo.edu
Team: LexEVS
Contract: N/A
Client: NCI CBIIT
National Institutes of Heath
US Department of Health and Human Services
Sign off |
Date |
Role |
CBIIT or Stakeholder Organization |
Reviewer's Comments (If disapproved indicate specific areas for improvement.) |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this document is to collect loader topic discussion and resolution for LexEVS. The focus is on the processing of source content as loaded into LexEVS terminology server proposed by the stakeholders and target users to make a better product.
Loader Topics
Control the setting of isActive via Loader preferences
GForge |
Issue |
Resolution |
---|---|---|
Different vocabs have their own way of determining whether a concept is active or not. For OWL we can use Deprecated status. For OBO or RRF we don't have that. We would like to be able to specify what method a vocab is using to indicate deprecated concepts in the loader preferences. |
TBD |
Discussion
Capture discussion here.
Examine use of LexBIG entity status
GForge |
Issue |
Resolution |
---|---|---|
The entity status for concepts should use a designated set of statuses that are mappable across vocabularies. For example: |
TBD |
Discussion
Capture discussion here.