NIH | National Cancer Institute | NCI Wiki  

WIKI MAINTENANCE NOTICE

Please be advised that NCI Wiki will be undergoing maintenance Monday, July 22nd between 1700 ET and 1800 ET and will be unavailable during this period.
Please ensure all work is saved before said time.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the CBIIT Atlassian Management Team.

Error rendering macro 'rw-search'

null

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Link to page: 9 - CBIIT Project Recommendations

Comments on November 22 version:

Section 9 > Tools Recommended for Semantic Infrastructure Work
Missing reference to CBIIT supported standards.
Resolution:

Section 9 > Tools Recommended for Semantic Infrastructure Work > Triple Store Access
Specify that ARQ supports the W3C standard SPARQL.
Resolution:
This is already present in the document. Eric Schripsema

Section 9 > Tools Recommended for Semantic Infrastructure Work > Semantic Knowledge
Store
Meaningless sentence: "and datasets which can be used in a way which will allow for some amount of use within service environments"
Resolution:
Clarified the intent of the sentence. Eric Schripsema

Section 9 > Tools Recommended for Semantic Infrastructure Work > Inference, Rules and Expert Systems
Additional to RuleML, RIF -- http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-overview/ -- should be mentioned as the standard for rule exchange (it does for rules what OWL did for Description Logics).
Resolution:
Added as a possible standard for rule definition and expression. Eric Schripsema

Section 9 > Tools Recommended for Semantic Infrastructure Work > Inference, Rules and Expert Systems > RDF and OWL Tools
I would put TopBraid SPIN together with ARQ, rather than with the RDF and OWL tools, as it would only support a small fragment of OWL namely OWL 2 RL (and is as such not a full OWL reasoner).
Resolution:

Section 9 > Tools Recommended for Semantic Infrastructure Work > Inference, Rules and Expert Systems > General Purpose
A section for pure rule reasoners seems to be missing (Jess and Drools are production rules engines), what is with reasoners such as Ontobroker (http://www.ontoprise.de/en/home/ products/ontobroker/ ), FLORA-2 ( http://flora.sourceforge.net/ ), dlv ( http://www.dlvsystem.com/dlvsystem/index.php/Home ), dlvhex ( http://www.kr.tuwien.ac.at/research/systems/dlvhex/ ), and others?
Resolution:
No intent to leave out any reasonable tool that can assist in the implementation. The difficulty being finding mature, supported, functional tools. If we could get some write ups as to how how to consider a specific tool conforms to standards or in other ways fits the problem, we can include them. Eric Schripsema; More information requested from the reviewer. Ann Wiley

  • No labels