NIH | National Cancer Institute | NCI Wiki  

What did we do well?

    • Started the sprint with reasonable Story Points.
    • Completed more story points than expected. 
    • Well planned stories and exit criteria.
    • Order of tasks was important - led to other tasks getting complete due to previously resolved tasks.  
    • Team was good at testing, merging testing bug fix branches. (manual CI process)

What should we have done better?

  • Miscommunication about adding mapping issue
  • Scope of performance task was much larger than expected.    This led to us not completing the user story.  (for example - should have had setup user story (configuring, loading content) and then performance execution user story and then finally a performance result/documentation story.)