{scrollbar:icons=false} |
Item |
Information/Response |
---|---|
Date: |
12/10/2009 |
Requirement # unique id <SemCon Ops Initiative>.<analysts initials><requirement number> |
Init3dbw2 |
Originator/Customer's Name: |
Yolanda Gil |
Originator/Customer's Company: |
USC |
Stakeholder Community:
|
cancer/medical researcher |
Summary of requirement pre-interview, by Reviewer: |
This will require additional information be collected about teh dataset, to go along side the data as an object. Additionally, there will be metadata about the individual data fields, that will allow appropriate transformations if needed between codesets, and this higher level data will describe the things that need to have been done to the data "the protocol" for the data. |
Recommended Next Step Enter one: Follow-up interview, Observe, Use Case Template (text), Use Case Model (formalized/UML diagram), Group Discussion, Prototype, Waiting Room |
Semantic workflows use cases - this is similar to Anand's requirement. |
Item |
Script / Question |
Information/Response |
---|---|---|
1 |
Hello, my name is NAME. I am calling you today because NCI and caBIG are working toward a new and improved version of the semantic infrastructure to better support integration scenarios. |
If yes, proceed. If no, note a good time to call back. |
2 |
Do you have any solution integration needs? If so, what are they? Have you envisioned new ways of interacting with existing or new parts of the semantic infrastructure? |
Yolanda develops workflows and has some use cases that can leverage semantics. |
3 |
Are there any business changes you are assuming we will be able to deal with? |
envision certain capabilities will exist - suggested that they be captured in pre-conditions |
4 |
Are there any capabilities you are expecting to be available to support your needs? |
Provenance metadata objects linked to data objects; workflow authoring engine; software developers who can translate domain specific validation rules into algorithms that can be stored and used to query against domain specific provenance instances; |
5 |
Do you use any of the existing software/services? If so, what do you like or dislike about it? |
No |
6 |
If this requirement in met, what would be the benefits? If you do not have it, what would be the negative impact? |
Researchers could easily run existing workflows with new data; researchers could find data and experiments that could be performed; researchers could find data and experiments related to their area of interest or data to help support their finding or hypothesis; new scientific discoveries could be made |
7 |
If, for any reason, we were not able to create that solution, do you think there might be another way to solve this issue? Can you think of an alternative solution? |
TBD |
8 |
Would you agree that we can summarize your requirement like this? |
Create the ability to develop semantic workflows to leverage and build upon services and data available through the grid and internet |
9 |
How important is this requirement to the interviewee? Required: Customer Priority/Annotationrement Analyst |
Select:
|
10 |
On a scale from 1 to 3 with 1 being "not satisfied" to 3 "completely satisfied", how would you rate your overall satisfaction with the product if this requirement was met? (Relative rating/ranking of how satisfied or dissatisfied interviewee would be if this requirement were met/not met) |
Select:
|
11 |
Are there other requirements that you would like to share with us? I'd be more than happy to call you back another time, or if you have another 10 minutes, please share other issues you can think of. |
(If yes, take notes to use in on a new page with this template; if time not available now, try to make appointment for another call.) |
12 |
Who else should we talk to in order to elicit more information about this need? |
Name of contact(s) |
|
For specific service enhancement or requirement from Forum entry: |
--- |
13 |
Can you or someone else give me a step-by-step description of how you would describe the expected performance/behavior of the software in order for you to feel that your requirement is met? |
--- |
14 |
Forum Link: |
--- |
15 |
URLs (optional): |
Links to pages or applications related to this requirement |
16 |
References (optional): |
Links to articles, papers or presentations related to this requirement |
Item |
Description |
Information/Response |
---|---|---|
Requirement Type (required) |
Analyst's assessement of the most appropriate category/type of requirement (no need to ask interviewee):
|
Functional and Non-functional Design constraints (new metamodels) |
ConOp Initiative(s) |
|
Init 1, Init 3, Init 4 |
Use Case Linkage (required) |
Which use case(s) is this requirement linked to? (should follow Use Case numbering scheme <SemCon Ops Initiative>.<analysts initials><requirement number>.<use case number>, for example Init1dbw1.1, Init1dbw1.2, Init2dbw2.1, 2.2, etc. |
Use case Number(s):TBD |
Conflicts / Dependencies(required) |
Are there any conflicts with other requirements / use cases? |
Yes, there are dependencies on data and analytical services exposing provenance data and relating it to their data objects; dependent on analysts to create rules from domain specific documentation about how data should be curated/processed in order to run the experiment successfully/validly |
Next Step (required) |
After reviewing the results of the interview, the forum, and all other materials related to this requirement, the analyst should recommend the next step, then attach the Tiny Link (on the Info tab) for this page to the Master List table. |
Develop Use Case template (text) and schedule Follow-up interview - Possibly assign to Baris |
{scrollbar:icons=false} |