Initial Analysis:
Item | Information/Response |
|---|---|
Date : | 01/08/2010 |
Requirement # unique id <SemConOps Initiative>.<analysts initials><requirement number> | Init3bes14 |
Originator/Customer's Name: | Frank Hartel, John Koisch, Paul Boyes |
Originator/Customer's Company: | NCI, Guidewire Architecture, Guidewire Architecture |
Summary of requirement initial analysis, by Reviewer: (as unambiguously as possible, describe who (List of Actors) is interacting with the system, what the business goal is and how the system might support the actor's ability to acheive their goal) | This analysis is based on a document that describes conformance profiles (also attached) historical link: https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/download/attachments/24255154/Conformance+Profiles.doc Prior to interview with John Koish and Paul Boyes, the requirement statement was not available. |
Recommended Next Step Enter one: Follow-up interview, Observe, Use Case Template (text), Use Case Model (formalized/UML diagram), Group Discussion, Prototype, Waiting Room | Follow-up interview with John Koisch and Paul Boyes to identify higher level requirements to support conformance profiles. |
Interview
Item | Script / Question | Information/Response |
|---|---|---|
1 | Hello, my name is NAME. I am calling you today because NCI and caBIG are working toward a new and improved version of the semantic infrastructure to better support integration scenarios . | Yes. |
2 | What do you do? What are your goals for the next year? Why are you doing this? | Develop conformance profiles to standardize the semantic and functional descriptions of services. Conformance Profiles are a mechanism used to constrain/group broader service capabilities/features to meet specific functional needs identified within a domain or locality. This increases interoperability and lessens the number of variations of implementations of services, and also provides clarity to potential service consumers. |
3 | In interacting with the caBIG infrastructure, do you have any solution integration needs? If so, what are they? Have you envisioned new ways of interacting with existing or new parts of the semantic infrastructure? | Conformance profiles is a new concept to caBIG and important to support ECCF (e.g. developers will provide conformance assertions for profiles) |
4 | Are there any business changes you are assuming we will be able to deal with? | --- |
5 | Are there any capabilities you are expecting to be available to support your needs? | A repository/registry to store conformance profiles. |
6 | Do you use any of the existing software/services? If so, what do you like or dislike about it? | Not for related purposes. |
7 | If this requirement is met, what would be the benefits? If you do not have it, what would be the negative impact? | It will help to standardize the semantic and functional descriptions of services. Consequently support interoperability among services. |
8 | If, for any reason, we were not able to create that solution, do you think there might be another way to solve this issue? Can you think of an alternative solution? | No. |
9 | Would you agree that we can summarize your requirement like this? | The new infrastructure should: |
10 | How important is this requirement to the interviewee? Required: Customer Priority/Annotationrement Analyst |
|
11 | On a scale from 1 to 3 with 1 being "not satisfied" to 3 "completely satisfied", how would you rate your overall satisfaction with the product if this requirement was met? (Relative rating/ranking of how satisfied or dissatisfied interviewee would be if this requirement were met/not met) |
|
12 | Are there other requirements that you would like to share with us? I'd be more than happy to call you back another time, or if you have another 10 minutes, please share other issues you can think of. | No. |
13 | Who else should we talk to in order to elicit more information about this need? | --- |
| For specific service enhancement or requirement from Forum entry: | --- |
14 | Can you or someone else give me a step-by-step description of how you would describe the expected performance/behavior of the software in order for you to feel that your requirement is met? | This will depend on individual requirement. This requirement should further decomposed beofre identifying these steps. |
15 | Forum Link: | --- |
16 | URLs (optional): | historical link: https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/download/attachments/24255154/Conformance+Profiles.doc] |
17 | References (optional): | Links to articles, papers or presentations related to this requirement |
Post Interview - ongoing throughout development of use cases:
Item | Description | Information/Response |
|---|---|---|
Stakeholder Community: | Enter appropriate category of stakeholder from Primary Stakeholders:
|
|
Requirement Type (required) | Analyst's assessment of the most appropriate category/type of requirement (no need to ask interviewee):
| Functional/Nonfunctional |
ConOp Initiative(s) |
| --- |
High Level Use Case Summary) | Please write a short descriptive narrative use case; the steps or activities in this use case are usually the things the user wants to accomplish with the system (user/actor's goals). | --- |
Use Case Linkage (required) | Which use case(s) is this requirement linked to? (should follow Use Case numbering scheme <SemCon Ops Initiative>.<analysts initials><requirement number>.<use case number>, for example Init1dbw1.1, Init1dbw1.2, Init2dbw2.1, 2.2, etc. | Use case Number(s): |
Conflicts / Dependencies(required) | Are there any conflicts with other requirements / use cases? | Yes OR No - If yes, what and why? |
Next Step (required) | After reviewing the results of the interview, the forum, and all other materials related to this requirement, the analyst should recommend the next step, then attach the Tiny Link (on the Info tab) for this page to the Master List table. | Decompose this requirement and conduct follow-up interviews with John Koisch and Paul Boyes to develop use cases for distinct requirements: |
